Posted by   I  

Suze Orman, a renowned financial expert and author, has been a prominent voice in the world of personal finance for decades. While she is known for offering invaluable advice on various financial topics, her stance on reverse mortgage programs has been a subject of interest and debate. In this blog post, we’ll explore when Suze Orman first expressed her reservations about reverse mortgage programs and the reasons behind her caution.

Suze Orman’s Initial Concerns

Suze Orman’s reservations about reverse mortgage programs date back to the mid-2000s. At that time, reverse mortgages were gaining popularity, and many older Americans were considering them as a means to access their home equity. Suze Orman voiced her concerns for several reasons:

  1. Complexity: Orman was vocal about the complexity of reverse mortgages. She believed that the intricacies of these loans often left seniors confused and unsure about their terms and implications.
  2. Fees and Costs: Orman highlighted the high costs associated with reverse mortgages, including origination fees, mortgage insurance, and interest charges. She argued that these costs could significantly erode a homeowner’s equity.
  3. Impact on Heirs: Orman also expressed concerns about the potential impact on heirs and the estate. With the loan balance typically increasing over time, she believed that heirs might inherit less from the home’s value.

The Evolution of Suze Orman’s Stance

While Suze Orman initially criticized reverse mortgage programs, it’s worth noting that her stance has evolved over the years. She has acknowledged that for some individuals in specific financial situations, reverse mortgages can be a helpful tool. However, she emphasizes that it’s essential for potential borrowers to thoroughly understand the terms, costs, and potential consequences before proceeding.